Debora addressing the Senate

New Hampshire's Executive Council

Executive Council districts map

District 5 is Amherst, Antrim, Bennington, Brookline, Deering, Dunbarton, Fitzwilliam, Francestown, Greenfield, Greenville, Hillsborough, Hollis, Hudson, Jaffrey, Litchfield, Lyndeborough, Mason, Merrimack, Milford, Mont Vernon, Nashua, New Boston, New Ipswich, Peterborough, Richmond, Rindge, Sharon, Swanzey, Temple, Troy, Weare, Wilton, and Windsor.

The Council's Official website, with the upcoming schedule, current agenda items, approved minutes, and archives


Why Do We Have an Executive Council?

From our beginnings, and even to this day, New Hampshire has had, shall we say, a skeptical view of government. The Council actually had its beginnings in 1679 when King Charles separated the territory of New Hampshire from Massachusetts. When our state constitution was written later, the Council was created as a constitutional body to watch over the actions of our governor.

What is the Council?

The Council is a body of 5 elected people from 5 districts. Each Councilor represents about 263,000 people. The map shows the current Districts, after Redistricting. District 5 lost some towns and gained others, I will have to work hard to introduce myself to voters in the new towns.

Why is the Council Important?

The Council meets regularly and has significant power over things such as:

  1. Judicial Appointments
  2. Appointment of agency heads and members of the state boards and commissions, and
  3. Approval of all significant state spending and that involves the major portion of our state budget.

As you can see, the Council is important. The governor needs 3 votes to do almost anything.

The Keene Sentinel puts it this way:

"The importance of the New Hampshire Executive Council far surpasses the small amount of recognition its members get from the press and the public. The five-member council was designed by the Founders to serve as a check on executive power, making it an important safeguard against cronyism, extravagance and graft. Its members vote up or down on all significant state contracts, all state judicial nominations and appointments of people to head all state agencies. It also sets priorities for all state highway projects.

"Executive councilors are powerful people who get their phone calls returned. And, in addition to their other duties, that makes them informal ombudsmen for their constituents. They are often called upon to mediate disputes among individuals, communities and government agencies - another function that can place limits on government excess. So it makes a difference who serves on this key body."

Agency Heads

The Council approves the leaders of all the state agencies, including:

The state of New Hampshire has about 10,000 employees and they are directed by these agency heads. When I was your Councilor, I did not vote for any agency head who didn't believe in the mission of the agency he or she wants to lead, or who didn't have the experience, or who wouldn't listen well. I voted for those who were respected by their peers, who were qualified, and who would listen. As we all know, a business, a school, and every other organization follows the leader of that organization. The tone is set at the top. My votes as Executive Councilor kept that in mind.

State Boards and Commissions

The Executive Council recommends and votes on appointments to hundreds of positions on state boards and commissions, including:

and many more.

I always looked for good people and made sure that qualified men and women from District 5 got opportunities to serve.

State Contracts

The third major duty of the Council is the approval of state contracts - they range from road improvements to service contracts to the purchase of goods. I did my best to approve the good ones and reject the bad ones. I didn't vote for any contract that was laden with conflict of interests. As you may remember, there was a controversy a while back over a contract that led to a huge scandal. A volunteer managed to get the state to adopt the contract and it turns out the volunteer earned a controversial commission of $187,000. I asked the right questions to try to prevent that from happening.

And speaking of contracts, I worked hard to make sure that businesses in District 5 who wanted state contracts got a fair shot at them.